Disability, Aging & Oppression
What is
Oppression?
Defining
oppression is very challenging. Perhaps the best way to define oppression is by
examining its root word: oppress. The American Heritage Dictionary defines
oppress in two ways: “to keep down by unjust use of force or authority” and “to
weigh heavily on the mind or spirit of (American Heritage, 1994).” I believe
that both of these definitions adequately explore what oppression manifests
itself as in the library environment for both the victims of oppression and the
applications on oppression to greater society.
Attempting
to understand what oppression is requires examination of group oppression
versus individual oppression. As library professionals, we tend to focus on individual
services and often stray from “grouping” patrons together. We focus on customer
service and user experience on a very individual basis. Each patron is
considered to be a unique individual with unique information needs. Yet, when
it comes to patrons with disabilities and patrons who are senior citizens, we
group. Peter Jones examined the philosophical aspect of group and individual
rights in his article, Group Rights and
Group Oppression (Jones, 1999). He writes:
“There is little about group rights that is uncontroversial but
there is at least this much agreement up on the basic concept: a right is a
group right only if it is a right held by a group rather than by its members
severally. If rights are held by individuals separately, their shared rights do
not add up to a group right even though their rights relate to a characteristic
which marks them off, sociologically, as a group. A right is a group right only
it is a right held by a group qua group (Jones, 1999).”
Although
this concept is very philosophical in nature, it does have very practical
application in the world of library and information science. Where does group
oppression begin and individual oppression end? How do we facilitate individual
rights without “grouping” all individuals experiencing disabilities together? Are
we addressing oppression with too much emphasis on group and too little
emphasis on individuals?
I definitely
believe that persons with disabilities experience oppression but I don’t
believe that this oppression occurs intentionally by most institutions and
individuals. Having a disability often times makes life more challenging and institutions
owe it to all patrons to provide access services which make the experiences of
the disabled as streamlined to experiences of the non-disabled, which is often
a challenging. It’s important for us to utilize all of the resources available
and to say informed to avoid unintentionally oppressing (“keeping down by force
or authority”) our patrons.
How would
you use issues of oppression in working with persons with disabilities?
Working in a
public library environment, library professionals encounter individuals with
disabilities on a daily basis. Often times we are unaware of the challenges
that many individuals with disabilities face. Perhaps our best line of defense
in attacking oppression is communication. Talking to individuals with
disabilities about their need and desires to improve services is often a simple
and practical tool that is far too often unused. Joining and keeping informed with
organizations that promote and inform about services to those with disabilities
is another way that oppression can be fought.
Can this
same concept of oppression be applied to the experiences of older adults?
Older adults
are definitely oppressed in many institutions. Again, I don’t believe that this
occurs intentionally most of the time, but it does occur. Perhaps one of the
greatest challenges that service to older adults bring is the inability on the
part of library professionals to understand their unique needs as individuals.
It continues
to amaze me how often senior citizens are typecast as having certain
personality characteristics and enjoying certain specific tasks. Not all
seniors have jolly personalities and enjoy Bingo. Also, not all senior citizens
read exclusively large print materials and have difficulties using computer
equipment. These stereotypes need to be addressed and recognized as issues of
oppression.
Work Cited:
American
Heritage Dictionary.
Jones, P. (1999), Group Rights and Group Oppression.
Journal of Political Philosophy, 7: 353–377. doi: 10.1111/1467-9760.00081